The Life and Opinions of Kathryn Elizabeth, Person

I was born at a very young age

Memo to the US: We may have the one of the best freight rail systems in the world but it’s terrible for passenger travel. I’ve taken trains all over the world, in first world countries and developing ones and I’ve never been bounced around as much as on this Amtrak train from Tampa to DC. I’d compare it to the 3rd world but any comparisons would be unfair because the 3rd world has functioning passenger rail. There’s no need for a smooth ride with freight but if we’re ever going to have a functional passenger rail system we need high speed dedicated passenger lines. If China can cover the county with rail lines surely the US can manage.

And that’s not even going into Rick Scott killing high speed rail in Florida.

Such a cool old train station. Also, currently a big thunderstorm, that’ll make things nice to look at out the windows.

Such a cool old train station. Also, currently a big thunderstorm, that’ll make things nice to look at out the windows.

Following in the footsteps of former Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, conservatives faced with these self-evident facts have taken to Fox News to cite the problems previous flat budgets have already created to call for a wholesale elimination of the National Weather Service. It’s a classic self-fulfilling sophistry of the right: Ignore the positive work an agency does, keep the agency’s budget flat so that its capabilities do not keep up with the times, then cite the agency’s reduced capabilities as justification to keep cutting it.

Anyone regret slashing National Weather Service budget now? (via wilwheaton)

I seem to recall going on a twitter tirade about this. Could Republicans please stop trying to kill the National Weather Service? So many more lives would have been lost without all the advance warning.

(via wilwheaton)

John Piper and Tornadoes, 2.0

One of the first blog posts I ever did on this incarnation of my blog was about John Piper’s insensitive comments after deadly tornadoes

He’s at it again. This was tweeted at 11:58 pm on Monday, just hours after scores of people were killed in Oklahoma.

And, in case he deletes it, here’s a screenshot:

There is a time and a place to be quoting Job, this isn’t it, or at least it isn’t the time and the place to be quoting that particular verse. The bodies aren’t even cold yet. To his credit, he’s also tweeting links to disaster relief, but this is so insensitive, I don’t even have anything more I can say. I’m too disgusted.

At least this time he didn’t blame it on the gays, I guess that’s progress?

The one thing you should never ask a homeschool kid

The local paper does stories on all of the high school graduations, and where the stories for the other school graduations follow the same formula—mention something from the speaker, go with a few quotes from graduates about going out into the world, the homeschool support group graduation story includes quotes from kids talking up homeschooling as a concept.

Don’t ask that question of kids. Seriously, just don’t. No kid should be put in the position of defending and explaining their education to adults.

Aside from the fact that in 2013 it’s not like homeschooling is something nobody’s heard of, that’s just not something you should put on a kid. It’s too much pressure and it makes the kid feel even more like an outsider, an “other,” and not part of mainstream culture. Even if a kid had an absolutely wonderful experience, homeschool apologetic isn’t something a kid should be expected to do. Parents, don’t ask this of your kids. Random strangers, don’t put a kid on the spot and start asking questions. It’s not fair to the kid.

I had to put up with random strangers asking me questions about homeschooling since I was six. Six. Let that sink in for a second. How in the world would anyone think that’s remotely something that you should put on a six year old? I can’t even count how many times I was wandering around the public library minding my own business looking for interesting books when I’d be stopped by a stranger asking me, “why aren’t you in school?” Now, granted, back in the ’80s, homeschooling was a novelty, but still. It would have been one thing if it had ended with me responding, “I’m homeschooled,” but nope, the next question was, “Is it legal?” Seriously, people would ask a little elementary schooler to explain the legality of their education. No six year old should ever have to cite statutes for any reason, but I spent a good chunk of my early school years explaining the legal status of homeschooling to adults who wouldn’t stop asking questions. It took me a few years after I finished college before I could begin to look at homeschooling objectively because so many adults spent so many years putting me on the spot, asking me to defend it to them. I still don’t understand why an adult would ask that of a child, especially a very young child, but that’s what happened to me and my siblings. It would make me feel like I was some kind of performing freak show to them.

So next time you encounter a homeschool kid and feel tempted to ask them about homeschooling, resist the urge. No kid should be put on the spot to defend their entire system of education,

And thus ends Kathryn’s rant.

What other fandom would a bunch of people accidentally get sent the season DVD with the season finale a week early and not have the whole plot plastered all over the Internet and the video on torrent? I didn’t even have to make an effort to avoid getting the Doctor Who finale spoilered. I guess all the River Song “spoilers” lines over the years sank in.

Just watched the season finale of Arrow. So good. So many feels. If you didn’t watch the first season, go back and watch it now that all the shows are going into hiatus for the summer.

Pawns in the culture war

This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes — Morpheus, The Matrix

In the few days since I wrote my post about what I strongly suspect is HSLDA’s litigation strategy to make homeschooling a fundamental right with no restrictions, not even for abusers, people have been doing some digging and have found information that quite frankly, is incredibly disturbing.

In a nutshell, in 2009 an all male group of homeschool leaders met for a summit at one of Bill Gothard’s ATI training centers to discuss the future of homeschooling. Included among the big names present were Doug Phillips of Vision Forum (and former HSLDA attorney), Brian Ray of NHERI, and Christopher Klicka of HSLDA. Among the topics discussed was a call to abolish child protective services and plans were outlined about how they would go about instituting a Christian theocracy with homeschoolers paving the way. Heather at Becoming Worldly and R.L. Stollar at Homeschooler’s Anonymous both have extremely long and extremely informative posts laying out what exactly happened at the summit, I think it’s important to go read both posts. While I’ve long suspected that there was an agenda based on the bits and pieces of memories I have from things I read and heard from various homeschooling leaders over the years, seeing the road map laid out was chilling.

I’ve snarked about the irony of HSLDA setting me on the path to where I am today by getting me interested in law, I’ve imagined how different my life would have been if I’d been accepted to the HSLDA intern program, I’ve written about HSLDA ignoring child abuse, and I’ve laid out my theory about HSLDA’s litigation strategy, but seeing Doug Phillip’s words presented in black and white in Heather’s post yesterday morning has thrown me for a loop. I’ve suspected for years that the self-appointed leaders in the homeschool movement were using us, but as long as it was just a suspicion I could shove it to the back of my brain and write it off as the conspiracy theory of an over-active imagination. I can’t do that any more, the proof is there.

I feel sick. I feel angry. And even more than that, I feel used.

My siblings and I were the successful homeschoolers. The ones that other parents could point to as the example that homeschooling could work. Other people started homeschooling because of us. My parents directed people to groups like HSLDA as a resource, never knowing that there was a broader agenda. Heck, I directed people to HSLDA. I wasn’t a debater, and I never had anything to do with Joshua Generation, but in my very existence as a successful homeschooler I helped sell homeschooling to other people. 

My very efforts to be normal showed people that homeschoolers didn’t have to be poorly socialized weirdos. People who then got sucked into the system and ended up buying into the messages that I hadn’t bought into and hurting their kids as a result. 

I took NHERI’s (poorly designed, self-selected) survey about homeschool graduates, and in answering truthfully about my positive experience, I became a pawn in the effort to convince the nation that homeschoolers were better, smarter, more successful than our peers. It was a message that sucked more parents into the system where they bought into the extremism and hurt their kids as a result.

Homeschooling can be great, it can be wonderful. When I was diagnosed with ADD, my doctor told me that my parents deciding to homeschool was probably one of the best things that could have happened to me. I’m the quiet kid who just stares out the window for hours and aces tests, not the class disrupter, so homeschooling kept me from falling through the cracks. And yet.

And yet. 

And yet I cannot separate my homeschool experience from the nagging feeling that by providing a safe, normal, successful face to homeschooling I was a pawn in the culture war to turn America into some sort of Christian version of Saudi Arabia. That wasn’t my choice.

There are steps I took during the culture war fights of the ’90s that I regret, and even though I was still a kid back then and didn’t fully know what I was doing, at least I went into it with some personal agency and I own that and learned from the experience. Being a cog in a homeschooling movement that has as it’s goal creating a Christian theocracy where men are the absolute heads and women only stay home and produce more children for the fight was not something I signed up for. It makes me feel dirty just thinking about it.

What makes me really mad is that in being used as a pawn in somebody else’s culture war, I was used as a pawn to make my own life harder. Not that I realized it at the time, but, I’m gay. It’s not something I chose, any more than I chose my blue eyes or being right handed. It’s just something that is. I don’t have a problem with it, I am what I am, and I wouldn’t change it. Changing would make me a different person. Not to mention that I think it’s kind of bad form to tell God that he screwed up in making you. That said, my life would be easier if there wasn’t a constant push back from culture warriors making it so that we have to fight every step of the way just to be treated as an ordinary citizen. It’s a front in the culture wars that Doug Phillips specifically mentioned at the 2009 summit, and in his vision homeschoolers are leading the fight. And my very existence as a successful homeschool graduate helps legitimize the movement.

Even if I repudiate everything, including homeschooling of any kind, because I was a homeschooler I’m still a pawn. I can’t escape it, not really. If I keep my mouth shut and play the role of the good little homeschooler, then I’m propping up a system that is actively working to destroy America as we know it. But if I speak up, if I tell the truth about my life, if I’m honest about the fact that while on most points I’m still a theologically conservative Christian, I’m also politically liberal, feminist, and gay, then I’m proof of why parents need to shelter their children, keep their daughters from college, and isolate themselves from mainstream culture. I can’t win. 

And so here it is, 6 am. I should be asleep but instead I’m here writing because maybe, just maybe, if I put my feelings down into words the turmoil in my brain will quiet down. I almost wish I had just done what I’ve been doing for the last decade, shoved all the niggling little memories about homeschooling back down, and gone about my business of being the normal girl who got by, on a technicality, with telling everyone I graduated from private school.

I’ve seen how deep the rabbit hole goes and now I wish I’d taken the blue pill.

Nothing disappears from the Internet

I google myself from time to time to keep track of what’s out there with my name on it. In searching the other day, I came across a post that I had written on the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood discussion listserv back in college. I forget exactly why I had joined the group, I think because I was writing some sort of paper for doctrine on something related to submission and headship and wanted to be sure I understood the best version of the complementarian argument. I thought I’d repost part of what I wrote in that post back in 2001 because in reading it I can see the wheels turning in my head as I began to realize the whole thing was bunk.

I think that attempting to equate the equality of men and women with the mathematical concept of equality is missing the point. Up to the point that I subscribed to this list, I was under the impression that complementarians thought that men and women were equal. Not that they have the same roles, and not that it means that there is no one in authority, but that as human beings created in God’s image, they are equal. The example that I have always heard is that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are all equal in that they are all equally God, but that in position, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit submit to the will of God the Father. In the same way, men and women are created as equal in their essence, but positionally, the husband is in authority in the home, and the man is in authority in the church. It’s a question of position, not that they are created to be inherently unequal. It’s just like saying that my boss is in a position of authority over me, but that does not mean that we are not equal as human beings created in the image of God.

There are two kinds of equality. One is equality of essence—that we are all equal because we are created in God’s image. The other is equality of position or giftings. If you are looking at this sort of equality, it is true that not everyone is equal—some people have a higher position, and not everyone is equally gifted. However, just because there is not complete equality in position or giftings does not negate the fact that all humans, male or female, are equal in essence. That was what Teri and Jeannie meant when they said that men and women are equal but not interchangable. The question is how the two different equalities fit together in the context of home and church. Egalitarians would say that those areas are covered by the first kind of equality, complementarians would say that they go under the second kind.

It is very dangerous to go about insisting that men and women are not equal. In the past that idea led to women being treated as not quite as human as men, with no rights in society.

At that point in my life, you can see that I was still buying into the complementarian viewpoint, but it was beginning to dawn on me that as much as I’d been taught male headship while seeing something much more egalitarian modeled, the patriarchal complementarians really did not see women as equal in any way to men. Over a decade has passed since then, and by the time I graduated college I had thrown out the whole patriarchal view completely, in large part because of my time on the CBMW listserv. I thought that this was an interesting snapshot of a time in my life when I started questioning assumptions. And, while I know this isn’t what the denomination wanted, what I learned from my professors at Covenant definitely helped me along the way to formulating what I believe today. The last dozen years have been quite the ride, and while twenty year old me wouldn’t have anticipated where I’d finally end up, I can look at what I wrote and see how I got here.

Moi

If you’ve new to my blog by way of my homeschooling and HSLDA posts, welcome. Although I’ve been blogging on it a good bit lately, the homeschool stuff is a relatively minor subset of what I write about. Like most things on here, I started out mostly writing about it for myself because I’ve never really sat down and thought through my experiences. I’m pretty sure though that when you’re six years old and being asked to explain the legality of homeschooling to the adult who stopped you in the library to ask why you weren’t in school, it’s going to have an influence on your outlook on life. 

It’s kind of weird though, writing about the legal issues relating to HSLDA, because I don’t know how many times I’ve told people, “I know it’s important, but there’s just no way I could do family law, I can’t handle how emotionally involved it is.” I’m taking a family law course next semester, but only because I thought I should at least take something so that I’ve got a well rounded education. What I’m really interested in is intellectual property law. The public policy that I want to be shaping is public policy in the area of technology, the Internet, and open source software. I’m a nerd, I’ve always been a nerd, the tech stuff is my bread and butter, and like how my dad took tons of math classes in college because he didn’t want to write, I found my way to computer science because I discovered I liked the puzzle of programming a lot more than writing research papers. I don’t really blog about the nerdy stuff though because on the Intarwebs, there are plenty of places to go hang out and talk to the other nerds about tech. 

Stick around and I’ll do my best to turn you into a nerd too.